Views: 2623

Articles that are against stem cell research

the embryonic stem cell debate is ultimately about the question of human equality. And right to life derives from human equality. From the beginning of the scientific revolution, science and technology have tried to allow us to manipulate and shape the world around us for the benefit of man. Human equality doesnt mean that every person is the same or that every person can even be valued in the same way on every scale. Scientists largely agree that stem cells may hold a key to the treatment, and even cure, of many serious medical conditions. Participants in phase I studies need to understand that the intervention has never been tried before in humans for the specific condition, that researchers do not know whether it will work as hoped, and that the great majority of participants in phase I studies. Recent Developments, two recent developments from stem cell research involve the heart and the blood it pumps. I think thats also a fair argument in the sense that there are always interesting things to learn from different kinds of experiments, but it doesnt address the ethical issues surrounding the debate. Adult stem cell research will prosper if they get the money currently going to embryonic stem cells, the pro-life supporters point out. Part of his articles that are against stem cell research argument for continuing to use embryonic stem cells was backward-looking to make the point that researchers wouldnt have been able to develop this technique if they hadnt been doing embryonic stem cell research. Pros, the excitement about stem cell research is primarily due to the medical benefits in areas of regenerative medicine and therapeutic cloning. But I do think it means that people are going to change the way they reason about the balance between science and ethics because of this advance. Those who are opposed to this research also believe that their tax dollars should not go to supporting the research regardless of whether or not the research is permitted. Evidence of safety and proof of principle should be established through appropriate preclinical studies in relevant animal models or through human studies of similar cell-based interventions. Another argument is that there are better alternatives to embryonic stem cells (Wikipedia, 2008). Lets shift gears to a question about religion and faith. Recently, researchers in the United States and Japan successfully turned human skin cells into cells that behave like embryonic stem cells. There have been many additional scientific studies published on the topic since then, and it appears increasingly likely that the cells produced using skin cells are the equivalent of embryonic stem cells. The new development offers the possibility that the controversy over the use of embryos could end. Obviously there are people of faith on both sides of this debate. Subsequent research led to the ability to maintain undifferentiated stem cell lines (pluripotent cells) and techniques for differentiating them into cells specific to various tissues and organs. But there are newer scientific developments, such as certain types of human enhancement technologies that raise very complicated questions of how we should judge the ends and the means of technological advancements.

Exam writing board Articles that are against stem cell research

The question is, but it is not a simple answer. That doesnt mean the that scientists no longer have any use for embryonic stem cells or even that they wont have any use for them. However, umbilical cordderived stem cells obtained from the cord blood also have been isolated and utilized for various experimental treatments. And indeterminate, despite reports that stem cells cannot grow into complete organisms. For the benefit of what, the Pew Forum and the Pew Research Center for the People the Press have done polling on this issue over the last six or seven years and have found that Americans generally favor embryonic stem cell research. The ethical question, the debates over the ethics of stem cell research began almost immediately in 1999.

In time, if there were no ethical concerns. I think that this is really about whether we believe in a liberal society. Lifting the ban on research would also. And what do you think this trend indicates. Allow the government to gain better oversight of embryonic research. Why do you think this has happened.

A few years prior to that, researchers in England began working polymers derived from bacteria that can be used to repair damaged heart tissue.Certainly I think that President Bushs commitment to human equality has a lot to do with a particular Christian sense of human worth and human value.