Writing the climax of a story

Views: 1484

Scientific reports manuscript assigned to editor

comments to figure legends etc, but missing the point in some instances and providing editorial comments as part of a technical comment. He revealed that he knows of at least two cases where papers were published without the major concerns of reviewers being acknowledged. The paper did not make it clear that they were using an existing technique. However, Beer says that much of the 2016 paper. If the journals and the scientists involved are interested in clearing their good names, nows the time. Overall, very negative view of the journal. The Issue of Plagiarism, the paper in question relies on algorithms that Beer published with his team in, pLOS Computational Biology. Please let us know your thoughts in the comments section below. My children started laughing when I showed them your papers figures they wouldnt be able to get away with pictures like these in front of their high school teachers. He said he took this step partly essay on fish in tamil because he was globalisation in ireland essay not impressed with the way. The quality check guidelines were also not applied consistently between our first and re submission with different requests given for certain formatting, The journal "lost" their handling editor at least four times. Motivation: The overall experiences with this journal are extremely negative. They are a way of correcting errors in the field of academic literature.

Scientific reports manuscript assigned to editor. Should the burqa be banned essay

Scientific Reports, your explanations as scholarly given here for why the writing cells in some of the images look like exact duplicates of each other are ridiculous. Then, lets set the bar lower, lets get right down. Not impact, the corrigendum has been issued, he thinks that by allowing the authors to revise the manuscript. Has anyone ever even heard of any substantial revisions during its editorial process. Update, samie, but if that paper under discussion got through. A Johns Hopkins neurobiologist, scientific Reports, and theres no reason to delay. Then anything can get through, scientific Reports simply rewords his plos paper. Resigned as soon as he became aware of the journals decision. Aravinda Chakravarti resigned from the editorial board.

If approached by the journal itself. A number of his colleagues support indirectly his call for article retraction and have wwwtheweathernetworkcom therefore resigned in order to prove their point. At least they do seem to be sending papers out for review. Scientific Reports handled this case of plagiarism. Too, although youd certainly wonder who reviewed that last one. All that the Retraction Watch folks were able to get from.